Thursday, March 17, 2005

L.A. Juries Do Again What They Do Best: Let The Celebrity Off

This is truly what Los Angeles juries do best: Find a way to let the celebrity defendant off scot-free.

It happened with OJ Simpson. It happened with the prostitution case against Edwin Moses. And now it's happened with Robert Blake. And all the Los Angeles Times, the hometown newspaper, can do is react with bemusement, as its reporters appropriately did this morning.

The real key in the Blake case may have been his success, after 11 months in jail, in getting bail. Once the old actor got off on his own, found a lawyer who know how to defend him and was able to create a nice persona for himself, the outcome could have been no surprise. The fact that there was considerable testimony Blake had threatened to "whack" the wife he didn't want, and even speculated that as an actor he would be able to worm his way out of the crime, committed near his favorite restaurant, didn't count at all. The jurors found brilliant excuses for not believing any of it. After all, the two stuntmen testifying against Blake had taken drugs and might be "delusional," they said.

It also was a mark of success for Blake that he was able to portray his wife, Bonny Lee Bakley, as a thoroughly reprehensible woman, who seemed to have deserved getting plugged while she sat in the family car, after having inveigled the poor Blake into marriage and even refused to get an abortion.

Times reporters, in this case, the outstanding and underrated Jean Guccione, who deserves downtown billing, Andrew Blankstein and the writer of the color story, the jubilant Blake holding forth, Sam Quinones, all did a fine job.

In fact, the Times usually does a great job covering crime; we also saw it last weekend in the Atlanta and Wisconsin massacre stories. Stephanie Simon, the St. Louis-based Midwestern reporter for the Times was able to cover both the Wisconsin and Atlanta stories at virtually the same time. She is a treasure, who lives in St. Louis because her husband is a cartoonist there, but who could successfully cover World War III from a small town in Iowa.

As it has turned out, the crime stories where LAPD and Sheriff's officers shoot or beat some hapless member of a minority group, are the most serious crime stories the Times covers. They have had riotous outcomes, with occasionally half the city of Los Angeles wrecked.

The only victims in the Blake case were Blake and his wife. The wife ended up dead, and Blake says he has ended up broke, although I imagine, even at 71, he will manage to recoup. In a pinch, he could go on the speaking circuit. His is a very entertaining story.

I wonder whether there will be a Times editorial. The hapless writers of the editorial page can only be victims too, if they so much as seek to do justice to this one. After all, it is hardly a triumph for our vaunted jury system.


Anonymous OJ said...

Bonny Lee created a wide swath of dislike. Any one of many could have done her in. I don't think Blake did and the case was not proven. Besides, the bitch had it coming.


3/17/2005 11:44 AM  
Blogger Dennis Mosher said...

Was this the jury's fault?

How about some accountability from the L.A. County District Attorney's office with regard to dropping the ball (or almost) on high profile cases:

Without Susan Atkins jailhouse confession and Linda Kasabian turning state's evidence, Charlie Manson might be on the golf course with OJ today! Or, what about the McMartin prosecution with preprogrammed child witnesses. Then there was the first Menendez Brothers trial. Then, the first Rodney King trial. And of course, OJ, wherein a white female and a black male where chosen to prosecute the case, because it was thought that a symbolic statement about race and gender was more important that legal skill.

I'm certain some L.A. Times editors read this blog. Hint: Do to the L.A. District Attorney's offfice what you did to King-Drew!

-- Dennis Mosher

3/17/2005 5:05 PM  
Blogger 贝贝 said...

The Tax Return Crack-Up<3>
Granted, there are usuallyMicrosoft Office 2010write-ups when presidential contenders make their tax returns available, but the coverage falls far short of the Office 2010
full court press (pardon the pun) that the Clintons have received. What's Microsoft Office 2007different now?Office 2007One possibility is that most upper middle class Democrats, and therefore most Microsoft OfficeOffice 2007 keyeditors and reporters of our nation's big papers as well as Office 2007 downloadtelevision producers, are Obama supporters who think that Hillary should hurry up Office 2007 Professionaland drop out of the race already.Microsoft outlook
Microsoft outlook 2010Whom elite liberals are pulling for really does shape political coverage in ways

11/11/2010 12:28 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home