Thursday, September 15, 2005

L.A. Times Makes It Clear This Morning, Schwarzenegger Is Reeling

In three separate articles this morning, the L.A. Times makes it clear: California's Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is suffering very bad political fortunes. The implication is that his reelection next year is in jeopardy.

The paper's state political columnist, George Skelton, makes the apt point that normally the governor would wait to see how he fares in the special election on state policies set for November before announcing his intentions for next year. However, probably as a sign of his bad political situation, he is not waiting. He dropped a broad hint yesterday he is going to run.

Then, the Times has an article reporting that Schwarzenegger's standing among Latinos, who provided him many votes in the Recall election, has deteriorated. Unlike George W. Bush, when he was governor of Texas, this governor has not even appointed Latinos to his cabinet.

Finally, the Times analyses a surprise Democratic victory in a special Assembly election in the South Bay, in the first round no less.

Were he not such a macho movie star, I would think Schwarzenegger would be privately contemplating not running for reelection at all. California is a Democratic state, and the Democrats will be putting a lot into retrieving the governorship here. The attorney general, Bill Lockyer, has, unwisely I think, pulled out of the contest, but two Democratic officeholders, State Treasurer Phil Angelides and State Controller Steve Westly, are fixing to run.

Schwarzenegger won the governorship in an unusual election as a celebrity against the detested and unsavory incumbent, Democrat Gray Davis. The circumstances of the Recall are not likely to be even remotely repeated.

But he has not proved to be all that knowledgable or able a politician. Although he ran against the special interests, he has proved to be a creature of the usual Republican special interests. Confronted with a Democratic-dominated legislature, he has often dropped the ball in dealing with it. And, then, California's budget and other problems have proved to be fairly intractible, although a boom in the stock market would aright the state's finances by sending capital gains and income tax revenues soaring.

Meanwhile, the war in Iraq and, now the hurricane diaster in the Deep South, have soured Republican national popularity. Next year, 2006, looks increasingly like it will be a Democratic year, unless the war enters a more promising phase.

Under all these circumstances, Schwarzenegger would have to be a magic performer to win, and he is not proving to be such.

Times political coverage under the new editor, Dean Baquet, and the metro direction of Janet Clayton, may well prove better than it was in the Recall campaign.


Blogger Thor said...

Schwarzenegger is a man clearly in denial. The majority of voters are against his special election, and only one of his three propositions has any chance of being passed right now. His public image is in tatters, and his hand has been caught in the special interest till too many times now, showing him to be just another liar and a bad politician.

9/15/2005 1:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes,if the LA TIMES says Schwarzenegger is toast it must be true. Not!
The man is doing what he was elected to do and while that doesn't set well with Skelton and most TIMES writers and editors I will wait and see. The amount of money being spent by special interest groups against the Governor has hurt him to be sure. But all you have pointed to are wishing points from from the left wing of the TIMES political desk.
What has the TIMES Poll shown for the upcoming election?
Oh tis true, I envy you your trip Ken - hope to follow in your tire tracks next year. But for now, it is time for you to get back in the groove. Coverage from the underfunded Chicago TIMES of Los Angeles is not anywhere near back to what it should be.

9/15/2005 2:12 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home