Monday, June 30, 2008

Can L.A. Times Survive Zell, Michaels, Hiller?

(Readers should be aware that a series of six blogs about 75 L.A. Times staff members who have lost their jobs under the Tribune Co. precedes this one. It can easily be accessed by entering my name into Google and scanning down under the Take Back The Times entry).

It is not too surprising that a determination to resist the deterioration of the Los Angeles Times that has grown quickly out of the wrongheaded decisions and plans of Sam Zell and his colleagues should surface most clearly, for the moment, among anonymous bloggers. The bloggers are perhaps voices out of the news room who realize all too clearly what is happening, and are daring to try to stop it.

A blog known as "Save Our Trade" (www.saveourtrade.blogspot.com) is floating a survey due July 15 asking a number of devastating questions about Tribune management, such as, what do the constant layoffs and other anti-employee actions have to do with the concept under which Zell used employee stock to take over control of the company, telling the hapless employees about to be terminated that they "owned" the paper?

Meanwhile, the TellZell blog (www.tellzell.com) is passing along a suggestion from someone at the Tribune-owned Orlando Sentinel that Times and other Tribune employees either call in sick on July 9, or conduct a byline-masthead strike for the editions of July 10. Tellzell has its own survey trying to determine whether employees think this is a good idea.

Of course, I certainly associate myself with these stirrings of action.

But the greater question at this point is, I believe: Can the Zell-Michaels plan for a "redesign" of the L.A. Times be stopped in its tracks?

We've already seen, at the Orlando paper, the dumbing down and tabloid aspects of the redesign of that paper. And although Tribune is saying there won't be a template on these redesigns for all Tribune papers, we cannot be at all sanguine about what redesign of the Times, and the promised drastic reduction in the number of its news pages, will mean.

I think there is every reason to fear that it would be a point of no return -- that no matter who came to own the paper in the future, it would be too late after the redesign, and too costly, to restore the paper to essentially what it has been since Otis Chandler became publisher in 1961.

Certainly our cherished national and foreign bureaus which have served the paper and its readers so faithfully, will, to a very great extent, fall by the wayside in a redesign. After all, didn't Zell rudely tell the Washington bureau months ago that he saw no reason it should have as many reporters as the Orange County suburban office?

And I was informed by a retired foreign editor just last week that he had been asked by Russ Stanton, the David Hiller-appointed editor of the Times, whether he felt it would be a good idea to abandon the Baghdad bureau of the Times and cover the Iraq war from afar. (Speaking of journalists serving the public interest, it takes a Russ Stanton to come up with an idea like that!)

Marjorie Miller (not my source) decided to step down as foreign editor shortly after that question was asked. She became only the latest in a long, depressing series of top-ranking personnel to leave their positions under the evil Tribune reign.

Would a redesign actually enhance local coverage and the Web site? I don't think so. Every time, a new step has been taken in the recent years of Tribune ownership, we have been assured that Metro (the California section) would have more more pages, or that the Web site would grow in offerings, timeliness and sophistication. Yet, none of these promises have been kept.

No, I think it is certain that a redesign would be absolutely devastating to the paper.

So, what can be done?

Every argument must now be made to Zell and the board of directors in Chicago that they should put such a radical retooling of the Tribune papers, and especially Times operations into abeyance until they have had a chance to consult with journalistic experts around the country to see how they think it would be received. (Virtually no one who has commented from outside thinks that Zell, Michaels and company know anything about the newspaper business).

Beyond that, the civic group of luminaries here in Los Angeles who first wrote then-Tribune CEO Dennis FitzSimons last year suggesting that, if Tribune wasn't willing to expend resources in Los Angeles, it sell the paper to someone who would, should become active again to push the demand that the paper be sold to local interests. This group represents the elite of the community. It is high time they show a little backbone.

It may well be that Zell is breaking the law, in some way, abandoning his fiduciary duty to the employee stockholders, by such a radical policy of changing his papers, which are already falling drastically in both circulation and ad revenue. A skilled lawyer might have to be retained to advise the employees whether it is possible to go to court to defend their interests.

Certainly, this is not the time to lose heart.

Now is the time to search for any means that will get the Times out from under the awful Tribune yoke, and bring to a halt the malevolent influence of Zell, Michaels, Hiller and other Tribune executives. Or at least delay them in their actions, until new rays of light begin to show themselves.

This is a bad time in the newspaper business, as it is, economically for the country in so many ways. But, I fully believe, brighter days will come, and we must do what we can to insure that they do.

Labels:

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ken, you will be missed.

6/30/2008 12:31 PM  
Blogger Edward Padgett said...

Ken,

Thank you for attending the dinners for the men working on the mighty printing presses at the Los Angeles Times.

We will all miss your candid posts on Tribune executives.

You made a difference and will be sorely missed by all you touched.

Edward

6/30/2008 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ken, we will miss you

6/30/2008 3:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ken Reich, trying to save a great newspaper until the end, virtually with his last breath. Well done.

6/30/2008 7:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for this last ray of hope.

In your death your words have been immortalized and as a student of the craft you honed so well, I thank you for giving me inspiration.

In a gloom and doom era of the newspaper industry, I don't believe you ever forgot or lost faith in the journalist or man.

Thank you and my condolences to the Reich family and friends.

7/01/2008 12:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Today, in light of the dire news coming out of the Times building, I am beginning to gather string on hiring an attorney to represent employees as plaintiffs in a suit against the ESOP trustee and Zell. Just as Ken suggested. I would welcome any expert advice or references of attorneys who specialize in this arcane corner of the law.

Zell's got deep pockets. Let's hit him where it hurts.

7/01/2008 4:28 PM  
Blogger Adi said...

Oes Tsetnoc Seo Contest one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides Upaya Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. By participating in the Oes Tsetnoc or Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about Oest Tsetnoc please visit my Oes Tsetnoc pages. And to find more information about Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa please visit my Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa page and other update like as Beratnya Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa, Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa di perpanjang and Jangan Berhenti Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. Thank you So much.

Oes Tsetnoc | Lanjutkan Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa

12/12/2009 5:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is a great reading. Thanks for sharing this information.We have few readers who would like to read this stuff. We will pass it on to our readers for more feedback. We are dealing with seo firms and would like to get feedback from you too.This is a nice postings indeed. Thanking You. los angeles seo expert

2/04/2010 3:19 AM  
Blogger Selfless said...

Epic's story and RPG-like focus is not a thematic side project or something that the developer is doing just for fun. The game can only stay applicable so long as gamers feel encouraged in what they are doing. That does not just mean playing with the competitive multiplayer each day to unlock challenges or mmogo fortnite items shop attempt to win a game. Being invested in Fortnite also means caring more deeply about what story Epic is trying to inform, where the match is directed, and how that interplay between narrative and gameplay will help the title evolve over time, like only the best of MMOs.

Also think of the Battle Pass, which urges players to log in each day and complete challenges to unlock improved rewards that can only be earned and not purchased. Each and every core pillar of Fortnite, from its growing storyline to its in-game shop to its seasonal competitive multiplayer strategy, feeds into a bicycle that helps the game remain relevant, popular, and lucrative. The gamers that are more invested become more likely to spend real cash.

So when folks say the future of online gaming looks like Fortnite, they are not only discussing the battle royale genre, buy fortnite weapons which won't feel so shiny and new a year from now. And like the most prosperous games of the past couple of years irrespective of genre, it is free-to-play and cross-platform, makes cash using vanity makeup, concentrates on letting players tell their own stories, and integrates community feedback on a regular basis.

1/23/2019 7:20 PM  
Blogger jasmyn said...

Now many players will buy POE Currency from POECurrency, so you can get unlimited POE Currency very conveniently.

4/24/2021 1:04 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home